A KNEE DESIGNED FOR THE HEAD & HEART
With 95% of patients satisfied with their outcome, the SAIPH® knee can support you to help patients live a life more like the one they want to lead. [1-3]
SEE HOW LEADING IN THE WORLD OF ORTHOPAEDICS HAS NEVER BEEN HARDER
You want to provide the best possible care and outcomes for your total knee replacement patients by making safe, data-driven decisions.
But balancing the time it takes to get clinical results against efficiency and simplicity is a growing challenge.
The SAIPH® Knee System gives you and your team efficiency and industry-leading results. All without putting your department through unnecessary change.
No gadgets. No gizmos. The SAIPH® knee helps patients feel satisfied with a knee that feels like it’s meant to.
Download a copy of our eBook to see how the SAIPH® knee is a knee designed for the head and the heart.
Download eBook
Please complete the form below.
A knee implant that creates natural freedom of movement [4-5]
Even with current technology, patient dissatisfaction rates for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) remain at 20%. [19]
This low rate can impact the orthopaedic community, because patients may think twice before undergoing their TKA procedure.
At MatOrtho®, we support orthopaedic leaders to improve patient satisfaction by offering an alternative to the current TKA procedures.
With the SAIPH® knee, we support you in reaching your patient's expectations by providing them with an implant proven to move like a normal knee. [4,9]
Download eBook
Please complete the form below.
A KNEE THAT FEELS LIKE IT'S MEANT TO
Studies show patient preoperative anxiety significantly predicts their dissatisfaction at one year compared to patients who do not experience anxiety prior to surgery. [20]
By using the SAIPH® knee, you can assure your patients they are getting the best medially stabilised knee implant on the market [21] and are likely to feel more satisfied than if they’d had an alternative implant.
Contact Us
Please fill in the your details below.
Discover the knee implant proven to move like a normal knee. [4-5]
- Proven to move like a normal knee by replicating the normal knee kinematics. [4]
Offers inherent stability throughout the full range of motion, mimicking the normal knee. [4,8,9] - TKA patients live better with a stable knee. SAIPH® knee has almost twice the number of patients with a stable knee. [8]
- MatOrtho®’s MRK™️ medially stabilised implant has the lowest revision rate in the NJR at 18 years, the SAIPH® knee is set to outperform this. [21]
- Leaves patients more active and more satisfied than alternative implants. [1-3]
Download eBook
Please complete the form below.
TKA patients live better with a stable knee. The SAIPH® knee has almost twice the number of patients with a stable knee. [8]
The SAIPH® knee is a medially stabilised knee developed by MatOrtho®. Based on results from studies, it is the best performing medially stabilised knee implant on the market. [21]
Contact Us
Please fill in the your details below.
MRK™️ has the lowest revision rate at 18 years. SAIPH® is set to out-perform MRK™️. [8]
The implant is the successor to the MatOrtho® medially stabilised knee, the MRK™️.
The SAIPH® knee retains all of the MRK™️ key design features that led to the original implant’s nearly 30 years of clinical success and improves upon them.
All 3 variants of the SAIPH® knee have a rating of 7A from ODEP and are on track to reaching 10A*. [12]
Download eBook
Please complete the form below.
A KNEE DESIGNED FOR THE HEAD & HEART
CREATING NATURAL FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT [4,5]
Contact Us
Please fill in the your details below.
References
[1] Baré J. The SAIPH medial stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A multi-centre 2-year outcome study across Australia & New Zealand. Presented at Arthroplasty Society of Australia ASM, Adelaide, 2021.
[2] French SR, Munir DS and Brighton R. A Single Surgeon Series comparing the Outcomes of a Cruciate Retaining and Medially-Stabilised Total Knee Arthroplasty using Kinematic Alignment Principles. J. Arth. 2020; 35(2): 422-428.
[3] Katchky AM, Jones CW, Walter WL, Shimmin AS. Medial ball and socket total knee arthroplasty. Five-year clinical results. Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B (1 Supple A): 59-65.
[4] Shimmin A, Martinez-Martos S, Owens J, Iorgulescu AD, Banks S. Fluoroscopic motion study confirming the stability of a medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2015;22(6):522-526. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.011
[5] Rhee SJ, Hossain F, Konan S, Ashby E and Haddad F. Patellar Tracking: A Comparison of an Implant with a Lateralised Trochlear Groove Compared to a Conventional Posterior Stabilised Design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94-B no. SUPP IX 90.
[6] Sabatini, L., Risitano, S., Parisi, G., Tosto, F., Indelli, P. F., Atzori, F., & Massè, A. (2018). Medial Pivot in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Literature Review and Our First Experience. Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11.
[7] Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Scully S, Callaghan JJ, Saleh KJ. Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:45–50.
[8] Jones CW, Jacobs H, Shumborski S, Talbot S, Redgment A, Brighton R, Walter WL. Sagittal Stability and Implant Design Affect Patient Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J. Arth. 2020; 35: 747-751.
[9] Munir S, Molloy D, Hasted T, Jack CM, Shimmin A and Walter WL. Sagittal Stability in Four Different Knee Designs. A Single Centre Independent Review. Orthopaedic Proceedings. 2016; 98-B (SUPP 4): 113. Presented at ISTA 27th Annual Congress, Kyoto, 2014.
[10] Robinson R.P. The early innovators of today's resurfacing condylar knees. J Arth. 2005; 20(1 Suppl 1):2-26.
[11] Jacobs H, Jones C, Brighton R, Redgment A, Talbot S and Walter WL. Sagittal Stability: KT1000 and PROMs. Presented at the Forever Active Forum, Valencia, 2019.
[12] Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel. (2023) ODEP rated products search “SAIPH Knee”. London, Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel. https://www.odep.org.uk/odep-products-search/?_sf_s=Saiph
[13] Beswick, A.D., Wylde, V., Gooberman-Hill, R., Blom, A. and Dieppe, P. (2012). What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open.
[14] Schindler OS. The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20:1227-1244 (ref. Figure 8, p1233).
[15] Johal P. et al. Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using ‘interventional’ MRI. J Biomech. 2005 38(2): 269-276.
[16] Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM, Reddix RN, Conditt MA, Mathis KB. Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Feb;(431):157-65. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150130.03519.fb. PMID: 15685070.
[17] Assiotis A, To K, Morgan-Jones R, Pengas IP, Khan W (2019) Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty: a review of the current literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29:1605–1615.
[18] Lim HA, Song EK, Seon JK, Park KS, Shin YJ, Yang HY (2017) Causes of aseptic persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 9:50–56.
[19] Nakano, N., Shoman, H., Olavarria, F. et al. Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 1971–2007 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04607-9.
[20] Pronk Y, Peters MCWM, Brinkman JM. Is patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty predictable using patient characteristics and preoperative patient-reported outcomes? J Arthroplasty 2021;36:2458e65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.064.
[21] National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. 19th Annual Report, 2022: Surgical data to 31 December 2021. www.njrreports.org.uk.
[22] Jones AR, Al-Naseer S, Bodger O, James ETR, Davies AP. Does pre-operative anxiety and/or depression affect patient outcome after primary knee replacement arthroplasty? Knee. 2018;25(6):1238-1246.
[23] Australian Orthopaedic Association. NJRR Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, Annual Report 2018: Prosthesis Investigations.
[24] Mehta N, Burnett RA, Kahlenberg CA, Miller R, Chalmers B, Cross MB. Mid-Flexion Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Diagnosis, Implant Design, and Outcomes. Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):e13-e19.
[25] Hossain F, Patel S, Rhee SJ, Haddad FS. Knee arthroplasty with a medially conforming ball-and-socket tibiofemoral articulation provides better function. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):55-63.
[26] Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2021 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA. 2021: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com.
[27] Okafor, L. and Chen, A.F. (2019). Patient satisfaction and total hip arthroplasty: a review. Arthroplasty, [online] 1(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-019-0007-3.
[28] DeFrance, M.J. and Scuderi, G.R. (2022). Are 20% of Patients Actually Dissatisfied Following Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature. The Journal of Arthroplasty. [online] doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.011.
[29] Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):57-63.
[30] Neuprez A, Delcour JP, Fatemi F, et al. Patients' Expectations Impact Their Satisfaction following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167911.
[31] Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006 Nov;452:35-43.
[32] Walsh M, Woodhouse LJ, Thomas SG, Finch E. Physical impairments and functional limitations: a comparison of individuals 1 year after total knee arthroplasty with control subjects. Phys Ther. 1998;78(3):248-258. doi:10.1093/ptj/78.3.248